Author name: Anna

Measuring personality in the presence of faking

Keynote at the European Conference on Personality, 7 August 2024, Berlin. Abstract: Every year millions of applicants to jobs or educational programs complete self-report measures of personality. Despite assumed validity and utility in selection, such measures are open to intentional manipulation by applicants who want to create a desired impression. These impression management behaviours are […]

Measuring personality in the presence of faking Read More »

FREE BOOK: Psychometrics in exercises using R and RStudio

Brown, Anna. (2024). Psychometrics in exercises using R and RStudio. Textbook and data resource. Available to read online on https://bookdown.org/annabrown/psychometricsR To download data for exercises in this book, go HERE Why I wrote this book? This book was born from computing workshop exercises that I created for my students over the past 13 years to

FREE BOOK: Psychometrics in exercises using R and RStudio Read More »

My interview with “Women in Research Methods”

In the summer 2023 I gave an interview to “Women in Research Methods” (WRM – see https://womeninresearchmethods.com/) – a network for women academics in management and the organizational sciences who share an interest in research methods. In the interview, I talk to Jayci Pickering about my career, my personal experiences and insights into current research

My interview with “Women in Research Methods” Read More »

Socially desirable responding and “faking good”

One of my long-term interests is understanding the nature of response biases in non-cognitive assessments, and suggest effective ways of combating them. Specific topics include: To overcome limitations of current models for faking, that assume that faking behaviour is consistent (individual fakes all items consistently) and varies only between person, I proposed a “Faking as

Socially desirable responding and “faking good” Read More »

Thurstonian models for preference judgements

Ipsative (or relative-to-self) questionnaires ask respondents to compare sets of two or more stimuli from the same domain, such as behaviours, values or interests. For example, to measure occupational interests, respondents may be asked to indicate their preference for two or more activities such as (A) planting roses, (B) receiving telephone calls, or (C) building

Thurstonian models for preference judgements Read More »

Scroll to Top